<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>textiplication.com &#187; Geekiness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://textiplication.com/category/geekiness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://textiplication.com</link>
	<description>Skott Klebe's blog - reading, writing, music.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 18:35:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Meme</title>
		<link>http://textiplication.com/2008/12/01/meme/</link>
		<comments>http://textiplication.com/2008/12/01/meme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skottk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Found objects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geekiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://textiplication.com/?p=336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Matthew Jarpe via Mary Robinette Kowal, 100 things you&#8217;ve done/won&#8217;t ever do [everything involving heights and climbing is automatically out due to acrophobia and bad knees]: 1. Started your own blog 2. Slept under the stars 3. Played in a band 4. Visited Hawaii 5. Watched a meteor shower 6. Given more than you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://feedback.matthewjarpe.com/2008/11/26/cant-think-of-a-blog-post-go-find-a-meme.aspx">Matthew Jarpe</a> via <a href="http://www.maryrobinettekowal.com/journal/100-things-meme/">Mary Robinette Kowal</a>, 100 things you&#8217;ve done/won&#8217;t ever do [everything involving heights and climbing is automatically out due to acrophobia and bad knees]:</p>
<p><strong>1. Started your own blog<br />
2. Slept under the stars</strong><br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">3. Played in a band</span><br />
4. Visited Hawaii<br />
<strong>5. Watched a meteor shower</strong><br />
<strong>6. Given more than you can afford to charity</strong><br />
<strong>7. Been to Disneyland</strong> [world, that is]<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">8. Climbed a mountain</span><strong><br />
9. Held a praying mantis</strong><br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">10. Sang a solo</span><br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #be3245;">11. Bungee jumping</span></span><br />
<strong>12. Visited Paris</strong><br />
13. Watched a lightning storm at sea<br />
<strong>14. Taught yourself an art from scratch</strong><br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">15. Adopted a child</span><br />
<span style="color: #000000;">16. Had food poisoning</span><br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">17. Walked to the top of the Statue of Liberty</span><br />
<strong>18. Grown your own vegetables</strong><br />
<strong>19. Seen the Mona Lisa in France<br />
20. Slept on an overnight train<br />
21. Had a pillow fight</strong><br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">22. Hitch hiked</span><br />
<strong>23. Taken a sick day when you&#8217;re not ill</strong><br />
<strong>24. Built a snow fort [</strong>man, have I  ever. I'll have to scan the picture sometime<strong>]<br />
</strong>25. Held a lamb<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">26. Gone skinny dipping<br />
<span style="color: #be3240;">27. Run a Marathon</span></span><br />
<strong>28. Ridden in a gondola in Venice</strong><br />
29. Seen a total eclipse<br />
<strong>30. Watched a sunrise or sunset</strong><br />
<span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #be3240;">31. Hit a home run</span></span><br />
32. Been on a cruise<br />
33. Seen Niagara Falls in person<br />
<strong>34. Visited the birthplace of your ancestors</strong><br />
35. Seen an Amish community<br />
<strong>36. Taught yourself a new language</strong><br />
<strong>37. Had enough money to be truly satisfied</strong><br />
38. Seen the Leaning Tower of Pisa in person<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">39. Gone rock climbing</span><br />
40. Seen Michelangelo&#8217;s David<br />
41. Sung karaoke<strong><br />
</strong>42. Seen Old Faithful geyser erupt<strong><br />
43. Bought a stranger a meal at a restaurant</strong><br />
44. Visited Africa<br />
<strong>45. Walked on a beach by moonlight<br />
46. Been transported in an ambulance</strong><br />
47. Had your portrait painted<br />
48. Gone deep sea fishing<br />
49. Seen the Sistine Chapel in perso<span style="color: #ff0000;">n<br />
50. Been to the top of the Eiffel Tower in Paris</span><br />
51. Gone scuba diving or snorkelling<br />
<strong>52. Kissed in the rain<br />
53. Played in the mud<br />
</strong><span style="color: #000000;">54. Gone to a drive-in theatre</span><br />
55. Been in a movie<br />
56. Visited the Great Wall of China<br />
57. Started a business<br />
<strong>58. Taken a martial arts class</strong><br />
59. Visited Russia<br />
60. Served at a soup kitchen<br />
<span style="color: #be323c;">61. Sold Girl Scout Cookies</span><br />
<strong>62. Gone whale watching</strong><br />
<strong>63. Got flowers for no reason</strong><br />
<strong>64. Donated blood, platelets or plasma</strong><br />
<span style="color: #be3240;">65. Gone sky diving</span><br />
<strong>66. Visited a Nazi Concentration Camp</strong><br />
<strong>67. Bounced a check</strong><br />
68. Flown in a helicopter<br />
<span>69. Saved a favourite childhood toy</span><br />
<strong>70. Visited the Lincoln Memorial<br />
71. Eaten caviar</strong><br />
72. Pieced a quilt<br />
<strong>73. Stood in Times Square</strong><br />
74. Toured the Everglades<br />
<strong>75. Been fired from a job</strong><br />
76. Seen the Changing of the Guards in London<br />
<strong>77. Broken a bone</strong><br />
<strong>78. Been on a speeding motorcycle</strong><br />
79. Seen the Grand Canyon in person<strong><br />
</strong>80. Published a book<br />
81. Visited the Vatican<br />
<strong>82. Bought a brand new car</strong><br />
83. Walked in Jerusalem<br />
<strong>84. Had your picture in the newspaper</strong><br />
<strong>85. Read the entire Bible</strong><br />
86. Visited the White House<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">87. Killed and prepared an animal for eating</span><br />
<strong>88. Had chickenpox</strong><br />
89. Saved someone&#8217;s life<br />
<strong>90. Sat on a jury<br />
91. Met someone famous</strong><br />
<strong>92. Joined a book club</strong><br />
<strong>93. Lost a loved one</strong><br />
<strong>94. Had a baby</strong><br />
95. Seen the Alamo in person<br />
96. Swam in the Great Salt Lake<br />
97. Been involved in a law suit<br />
<strong>98. Owned a cell phone<br />
99. Been stung by a bee<br />
100. Read an entire book in one day<br />
</strong></p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">44</span> <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">48</span> 49! I keep finding more.  I don&#8217;t know where Matthew got the list, which has at least one dependent element &#8211; do 49, get 81 for free.</p>
<p>Like Matthew, I&#8217;m taking credit for 94 when all of the hard work was done by someone else.</p>
<p>Seeing 100 not bolded on someone&#8217;s list would make me very sad.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see &#8211; things I&#8217;ve done that are least likely to appear on someone else&#8217;s list:</p>
<p>101. Read War and Peace in one day.  The Sunday after the first US war in Iraq started, I woke with the idea and carried it out.  Third time I read W&amp;P.</p>
<p>101a.  Read more than one entire book in a day.</p>
<p>101b.  Read four books in one day.  Pride and Prejudice, The Naive and Sentimental Lover (LeCarre), A Mask for the General (Lisa Goldstein), Taming a Seahorse (Robert B. Parker).</p>
<p>[I'm just plain obsessive at times.  In one 24-hour period this weekend, I read Roberto Bolano's 2666.  In the next 24-hour period, I reread Memory, Komarr, and A Civil Campaign, by Lois McMaster Bujold.  And I was social enough through all this that no one killed me.]</p>
<p><a title="2666" href="http://flickr.com/photos/54688197@N00/2913559700"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3294/2913559700_e9c5778c17_m.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>[Not my copy]</p>
<p>102. Attended college as a fifteen year old.  For three weeks, then I turned sixteen.</p>
<p>103. Been frisked by soldiers of a national army and a revolutionary army in the same day.  Night, actually, in Colombia.</p>
<p>104. Climbed around in the stacks of the Library of Congress.  As a kid.</p>
<p>105.  Had more than fifty books in my car at once.</p>
<p>106.  Written a PDF reader &#8211; in Java 1.1.  Ooh, you madman.</p>
<p>107.  Ridden the cable car into the mountains outside Zagreb.</p>
<p>108.  Squared timber with an axe.</p>
<p>109.  Conversed for hours with someone I didn&#8217;t share a language with.</p>
<p>110.  Been to a wedding in Venice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://textiplication.com/2008/12/01/meme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I hope that this comment doesn&#8217;t become typical of Google&#8217;s approach to Chrome security</title>
		<link>http://textiplication.com/2008/09/15/i-hope-that-this-comment-doesnt-become-typical-of-googles-approach-to-chrome-security/</link>
		<comments>http://textiplication.com/2008/09/15/i-hope-that-this-comment-doesnt-become-typical-of-googles-approach-to-chrome-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skottk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geekiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Rakowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://textiplication.com/2008/09/15/i-hope-that-this-comment-doesnt-become-typical-of-googles-approach-to-chrome-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From an interview at Google Blogoscoped with Google group product manager Brian Rakowski: &#8230; There are ways to make Chrome automatically download a file without the user confirming this (at least using Chrome’s default options). Don’t you consider that a potential problem? On its own, downloading a file isn’t dangerous. It can be annoying if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-09-15-n69.html">an interview at Google Blogoscoped</a> with Google group product manager Brian Rakowski:</p>
<p><strong>&#8230;</strong></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>There are ways to make Chrome automatically download a file without the user confirming this (at least using Chrome’s default options). Don’t you consider that a potential problem?</strong></p>
<p>On its own, downloading a file isn’t dangerous. It can be annoying if a site tries to download a bunch of files to fill up your hard drive, but there are other ways to do things like that and it hasn’t become a problem. The danger arises when an automatically downloaded file can be automatically executed. We’ve taken steps to prevent this in Google Chrome and will continue to make sure that this is the case.</p></blockquote>
<p>This answer is incredibly disingenuous.</p>
<p>How about this comparison? Leaving your front door open is not inherently dangerous.  It&#8217;s only a problem if an attacker walks in through the open door and steals your stuff!</p>
<p>Is downloading a file inherently dangerous? Of course not, I do it all the time &#8211; when I want to! If Chrome can be fooled into downloading a file without the user&#8217;s permission &#8211; <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1843">and it can</a> &#8211; that means that an attacker can place malware onto your machine, and it&#8217;s up to <em>you</em> not to launch it.  Even if it&#8217;s named Spore.exe, and has a Spore shortcut on the Start men<a href="http://textiplication.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image6.png"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" src="http://textiplication.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image-thumb6.png" border="0" alt="image" width="212" height="216" align="right" /></a>u linking to it. A Start menu shortcut is itself just a file.  Arbitrary file downloads are inherently dangerous.  You can&#8217;t say &#8220;It&#8217;s only dangerous if&#8230;&#8221; the file automatically gets executed, because it&#8217;s much easier to convince the end user to execute a file than it is to force it onto the end-user&#8217;s machine!</p>
<p>With decent security in place, that is.</p>
<p>BTW, this vulnerability calls into question the whole trust model that the comic book brags about on <a href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/small_26.html">page 26-27</a>, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://textiplication.com/2008/09/15/i-hope-that-this-comment-doesnt-become-typical-of-googles-approach-to-chrome-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome again&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://textiplication.com/2008/09/04/chrome-again/</link>
		<comments>http://textiplication.com/2008/09/04/chrome-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skottk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geekiness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://textiplication.com/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, I really like it. It&#8217;s way, way faster than Firefox 3 or IE7 or 8, for initial launches and individual page loads. Though I made fun of the comic book, it does cover a lot more info than I remember Mozila or the IE team ever releasing on the architectures of their browsers &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I really like it.  It&#8217;s way, way faster than Firefox 3 or IE7 or 8, for initial launches and individual page loads.<br />
Though I made fun of the comic book, it does cover a lot more info than I remember Mozila or the IE team ever releasing on the architectures of their browsers &#8211; and Opera? Forget it.  They cover a lot of interesting points for the user, the developer, and the security guy.  I&#8217;m impressed by all of it.</p>
<p><a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/fresh-take-on-browser.html">Google Chrome</a> is, though, a web browser, which means that it is inevitably a huge and complex piece of software riddled with security defects.  Since it&#8217;s new, we don&#8217;t know what any of them are, though!  They are there, though, and they&#8217;ll jump out at us pretty rapidly.<br />
Here&#8217;s one, via <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1847">Zero Day</a> and <a href="http://evilfingers.com/advisory/google_chrome_poc.php">Evil Fingers</a>.  </p>
<blockquote><p>“An issue exists in how chrome behaves with undefined-handlers in chrome.dll version 0.2.149.27. A crash can result without user interaction. When a user is made to visit a malicious link, which has an undefined handler followed by a ’special’ character, the chrome crashes with a Google Chrome message window “Whoa! Google Chrome has crashed. <a href="http://evilfingers.com/advisory/google_chrome_poc.php">Restart now</a>?”</p></blockquote>
<p>This is bad enough we&#8217;ll see it patched really soon.  The problem isn&#8217;t just that a malicious URL can crash the browser, it&#8217;s the risk that the crash could lead to a stack overflow.  They&#8217;re using ASLR &#8211; address space layout randomization &#8211; which makes that kind of attack harder to mount.</p>
<p>The second issue Zero Day cites was a big flaming red flag when it showed up in Safari &#8211; the ability of a malicious site to drop files onto the desktop.  The Google proof-of-concept exploit may not seem as bad as the Safari carpet-bombin issue, since the user currently has to OK the desktop file save.  <a href="http://aviv.raffon.net/2008/09/03/GoogleMule.aspx">Aviv Raff&#8217;s</a> exploit is an interesting combination of old attacks on aging components incorporated into Chrome and a brand-new vulnerability fresh from Black Hat 2008.</p>
<p>SOOO&#8230;<br />
I&#8217;d continue to use Firefox for your everyday casual browsing needs.  Chrome won&#8217;t be safe for a while yet &#8211; no new browser could be.  IE7 isn&#8217;t bad, and IE8 will be pretty good.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://textiplication.com/2008/09/04/chrome-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>French Cable Station Museum</title>
		<link>http://textiplication.com/2008/09/03/french-cable-station-museum/</link>
		<comments>http://textiplication.com/2008/09/03/french-cable-station-museum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skottk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Found objects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geekiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://textiplication.com/2008/09/03/french-cable-station-museum/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may sound more like the name of an early Elephant 6 band &#8211; cf. Neutral Milk Hotel, Olivia Tremor Control &#8211; but it&#8217;s a wonderful little museum in Orleans, MA. We went there a few weeks ago during our one week vacation on Cape Cod, and for me, at least, it was the height [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may sound more like the name of an early <a href="http://www.elephant6.com/">Elephant 6</a> <a href="http://www.elephant6.com/bands.html">band</a> &#8211; cf. <a href="http://neutralmilkhotel.net/">Neutral Milk Hotel</a>, <a href="http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&amp;friendid=37207670">Olivia Tremor Control</a> &#8211; but it&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.frenchcablestationmuseum.org/">wonderful little museum</a> in Orleans, MA. We went there a few weeks ago during our one week vacation on Cape Cod, and for me, at least, it was the height of the trip.</p>
<p>The first transatlantic telegraph cable connected the US with London, although it took several tries for it to be successful. The French wanted to have their own nearly-instantaneous link with the US that didn&#8217;t run through London &#8211; diplomatic concerns, don&#8217;t you know &#8211; and laid their own cable from France to <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=st.+pierre+and+miquelon&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;ll=48.195387,-56.271973&amp;spn=5.001923,8.569336&amp;z=7">St. Pierre et Miquelon</a> &#8211; French-owned islands off the coast of Newfoundland &#8211; and from there down the Atlantic coast to Orleans. The French built a telegraph station in a not-so-big house by the water and operated it for over seventy years, apparently upgrading, repairing, patching, and reinventing it on the fly. Much of that equipment has remained in the house since the station shut down in 1959, and it&#8217;s now lovingly maintained by a number of elderly gentlemen who run the museum.</p>
<p>The equipment is beautiful. Apologies for the quality of some of these pictures &#8211; the only camera I had with me was my iPhone.</p>
<p><a href="http://textiplication.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/giant-capacitor.jpg"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" border="0" alt="Giant capacitor" src="http://textiplication.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/giant-capacitor-thumb.jpg" width="364" height="484" /></a></p>
<p>They let you use some of the equipment! My favorite thing in the museum is the <a href="http://www.google.com/patents?id=XPx9AAAAEBAJ">Kleinschmidt Perforator</a>:</p>
<p><a href="http://textiplication.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/kleinschmidt-perforator1.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" border="0" alt="Kleinschmidt Perforator" src="http://textiplication.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/kleinschmidt-perforator-thumb1.jpg" width="304" height="229" /></a></p>
<p>Mr Kleinschmidt &#8211; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Kleinschmidt">quite an important guy, really</a>- took a standard typewriter and added a tape-puncher on top. Anyone who could type could be a telegrapher; in Thomas Edison&#8217;s youth, a skilled telegrapher was a highly-paid professional. Edison himself was one of the best in the world, in fact. By the 20th century, though, innovation had stolen the luster from the telegraphy profession, replacing it with wonderful objects like this.</p>
<p>And this:</p>
<p><a href="http://textiplication.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/experimental-morse-transcriber1.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" border="0" alt="Experimental morse transcriber" src="http://textiplication.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/experimental-morse-transcriber-thumb1.jpg" width="304" height="229" /></a></p>
<p>This is a telegraph transcriber. They didn&#8217;t have felt-tip pens, of course, so they had to invent low-friction pens. Dead center in this picture you can see a tiny white whisker. It&#8217;s actually a glass tube about a millimeter wide. In this transcriber, the tip of the glass tube sat a mil or so distant from the paper, and the ink would be drawn to the paper by static electricity generated by this:</p>
<p><a href="http://textiplication.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/7000-volt-generator21.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" border="0" alt="7000-volt generator2" src="http://textiplication.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/7000-volt-generator2-thumb1.jpg" width="304" height="229" /></a></p>
<p>Lovely, isn&#8217;t it? Unfortunately, the static-charged contactless pen only worked in low humidity. On Cape Cod, you really don&#8217;t ever get low humidity, so this experimental transcriber only worked in winter.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a working transcriber:</p>
<p><a href="http://textiplication.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/functioning-transcriber-21.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" border="0" alt="Functioning Transcriber 2" src="http://textiplication.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/functioning-transcriber-2-thumb1.jpg" width="304" height="229" /></a></p>
<p>By working, I mean they actually let you work it! The low green box to the right is a punched-tape reader; you feed in the tape you punch on the Kleinschmidt Perforator, and the signal travels six inches to the transcriber, which as you see here is currently using a ballpoint pen instead of the incredibly fragile glass pipettes. The transcriber produces an EEG-like trace of the Morse signal, which you can easily read if you have a) learned your Morse cold and b) further, learned to read Morse as an EEG-like high-low voltage trace instead of dots and dashes. Probably only the ancient gentlemen who operate the museum possess these skills today.</p>
<p>The cable carried direct current over two thousand miles! At the end of its transit the signal was extremely weak, so much of the energy of the inventor team was engaged in reading or amplifying the faint voltage fluctuations. Here&#8217;s a real gem:</p>
<p><a href="http://textiplication.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/heurtley-magnifier1.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" border="0" alt="Heurtley Magnifier" src="http://textiplication.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/heurtley-magnifier-thumb1.jpg" width="304" height="229" /></a></p>
<p>There are only two of these babies left in the whole world. The Heurtley Magnifier used two pairs of platinum wire to form a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheatstone_bridge">Wheatstone bridge</a>, with one of the four wires heated ever-so-slightly by the signal current. The slight temperature variations produced enough resistance in the detector wire to control a larger current through the bridge. Vibration was a problem &#8211; they couldn&#8217;t receive a signal on that one afternoon every couple of weeks when the hardware store across town had its coal shipment dumped into the basement.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re on the Cape, I highly recommend this tiny little museum. Tended with love by men who rescued the building and equipment from destruction, it&#8217;s a rare opportunity to understand the technology constraints of an earlier era, and appreciate the astounding feats of engineering on which the modern world is built.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://textiplication.com/2008/09/03/french-cable-station-museum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What comes after Web 3.0?</title>
		<link>http://textiplication.com/2007/08/29/what-comes-after-web-30/</link>
		<comments>http://textiplication.com/2007/08/29/what-comes-after-web-30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skottk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geekiness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://textiplication.com/2007/08/29/what-comes-after-web-30/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, people are talking about Web 3.0 already, which for some reason tonight put me into the way-back machine.&#160; You know what I&#8217;m thinking, right? Some major company always nailed a product on the third release.&#160;&#160; Had a big hit with the 3.0, even bigger hit with the 3.1, so what did they follow up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, <a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/web3point0">people</a> are <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/blogspotting/archives/2006/10/web_30.html">talking</a> about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_3">Web 3.0</a> already, which for some reason tonight put me into the way-back machine.&nbsp; You know what I&#8217;m thinking, right? Some major company always nailed a product on the third release.&nbsp;&nbsp; Had a big hit with the 3.0, even bigger hit with the 3.1, so what did they follow up 3.1 with?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s back to the future, baby.&nbsp; Mark my words, couple more years of the Web x.0 thing, we&#8217;ll all be gearing up for Web 95.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://textiplication.com/2007/08/29/what-comes-after-web-30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

