Now here’s a good article on SF economics…

http://www.costik.com/inttrade.html

Explores the costs of interstellar travel: around $11 billion/kilo for a 5-light-year round trip.  Money quote:

…human beings are unlikely ever to go to the stars, given the mass entailed in the life support system necessary to keep a human alive for several decades.

Posted in Uncategorized

Why I’m not trying to write hard SF yet…

Updated: quote attributed to John is actually from Anders Sandberg

 

It’s too damn hard.

http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/004568.html

A couple of libertarian economists at the von Mises Institute criticize Accelerando’s discussion of Economics 2.0 for, it appears,  not having completely succeeded in supplanting their own doctrine in the course of a side-discussion in the opening section of a novel that has way too much on its plate anyway.   

My first reaction was much the same as Anders Sandberg’s, in the passage that John quotes - that great hard SF today requires polymathic mastery of so many disciplines that very few can really succeed at it. 

“…Maybe a true hard sf author in 2020 will have to master not just physics, biology, computer science, economics, sociology, psychology - and write well, of course. We better invent brain enhancements quickly if we are to get anybody with that kind of expertise….”

Then I read the actual attack from the von Mises folks.

I suppose it was an easy article to publish.  As a plea for attention, academics will sometimes attempt to dissect pop culture, and Stross probably is pop culture to academic libertarian economists.   Usually it’s done in good fun, though, with a recognition of the intrinsic irony of the attack: Don Quixote jousts with pictures of windmills, the actual windmills having proven too tough.  Not in this case, though:

Ever the second-hander intellectual mountebank, Stross manages to mangle a bevy of technical and economic gobbledygook and shoehorn it into an exponentially spiraling plotline.

Whoa, ho ho!  My first response is something like this:

Q: How many academic libertarian economists does it take to screw in a light bulb?

A: That’s not funny!

Stross does paint some kind of target on himself, having addressed libertarian economics so directly (if briefly) in Accelerando’s, but the bitter anger in this piece from the von Mises Institute is quite exceptional.  I would think they’d be pleased as punch that anyone was even paying attention to libertarian economics in a science fiction novel, much as any phlogiston chemist might similarly be.

You [noticed] me! You really did! You [noticed] me!

- Sally Field (paraphrased)

The response by Anders Sandberg is considerably more balanced, observing that Accelerando’s at least raises interesting questions for economists to research.   Anders also questions the Mises’ folks dogmatic criticism of Economics 2.0:

But even a free market economy might get sufficient bumps by the rapid growth of the posthuman intelligences inside it. Plateaus and breakthroughs in developing whatever software the entities desire/are would introduce noise, and it seems to me that it is not clear at all that a rapidly smarter population (with possibly exponentially growing differences in smartness) would be evenly rotating. Misallocations and adjustments can still occur if they are impossible for intelligences of level X to foresee but obvious for level X+1 (or X+100) intelligences.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Great science projects and stuff site

http://scitoys.com/

 

Projects include easy-to-make electric motors that actually work.

You can buy gallium - melts in your hand!

Posted in Uncategorized

Top 50 SF Books?

Lou Anders posted the SFBC’s top fifty, highlighting which he’d read and loved.  Great idea, Lou! Here’s mine

This is the Science Fiction Book Club’s list of the fifty most significant science fiction/fantasy novels published between 1953 and 2002.

The Key:
Bold the ones you’ve read.
Strike-out the ones you hated.
Italicize those you started but never finished.
Put an asterisk beside the ones you loved.
Additional notes below indicated with lower-case letters.

1. The Lord of the Rings, J.R.R. Tolkien*
2. The Foundation Trilogy, Isaac Asimov
3. Dune, Frank Herbert*
4. Stranger in a Strange Land, Robert A. Heinlein*
5. A Wizard of Earthsea, Ursula K. Le Guin* a
6. Neuromancer, William Gibson*
7. Childhood’s End, Arthur C. Clarke
8. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, Philip K. Dick*
9. The Mists of Avalon, Marion Zimmer Bradley
10. Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury
11. The Book of the New Sun, Gene Wolfe
12. A Canticle for Leibowitz, Walter M. Miller, Jr.*
13. The Caves of Steel, Isaac Asimov*
14. Children of the Atom, Wilmar Shiras
15. Cities in Flight, James Blish* b
16. The Colour of Magic, Terry Pratchett c
17. Dangerous Visions, edited by Harlan Ellison*
18. Deathbird Stories, Harlan Ellison*
19. The Demolished Man, Alfred Bester*
20. Dhalgren, Samuel R. Delany
21. Dragonflight, Anne McCaffrey*
22. Ender’s Game, Orson Scott Card*
23. The First Chronicles of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever, Stephen R. Donaldson* d 
24. The Forever War, Joe Haldeman*
25. Gateway, Frederik Pohl*
26. Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, J.K. Rowling*
27. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams*
28. I Am Legend, Richard Matheson
29. Interview with the Vampire, Anne Rice
30. The Left Hand of Darkness, Ursula K. Le Guin*
31. Little, Big, John Crowley*
32. Lord of Light, Roger Zelazny*
33. The Man in the High Castle, Philip K. Dick*
34. Mission of Gravity, Hal Clement
35. More Than Human, Theodore Sturgeon
36. The Rediscovery of Man, Cordwainer Smith
37. On the Beach, Nevil Shute e
38. Rendezvous with Rama, Arthur C. Clarke*
39. Ringworld, Larry Niven*
40. Rogue Moon, Algis Budrys
41. The Silmarillion, J.R.R. Tolkien
42. Slaughterhouse-5, Kurt Vonnegut*
43. Snow Crash, Neal Stephenson*
44. Stand on Zanzibar, John Brunner*
45. The Stars My Destination, Alfred Bester*
46. Starship Troopers, Robert A. Heinlein
47. Stormbringer, Michael Moorcock
48. The Sword of Shannara, Terry Brooks f
49. Timescape, Gregory Benford
50. To Your Scattered Bodies Go, Philip Jose Farmer*

So I’ve at least attempted all but nine of the fifty, heard of all but one (Wilmar Shiras? Children of the Atom?), and loved thirty of the fifty.  I’d put them into considerably different order (Stand on Zanzibar, Lord of Light, Snow Crash, Man in the High Castle, and Little, Big would be the top 5 I’d choose from this list).  I wonder what happened to the first Amber Chronicles, Moon is a Harsh Mistress (after the obligatory Stranger - way too high - the only other Heinlein is Starship Troopers, for Darwin’s sake?)   Another kind

As always, the interesting questions are why some things are there and not others.  A few of the entries are entire series (LOTR, Book of the New Sun, and Cities in Flight), others are single volumes from series (Earthsea, Ender’s Game, Dangerous Visions), and one is one-half of the series eligible within the time frame (Thomas Covenant).  LOTR and New Sun are legendary as series, while Cities in Flight is pretty obscure (I’ve never met anyone else who’s read any of it).  It’s interesting to compare Cities in Flight with Ender’s Game et al.:

  • in CIF, the first two books are conceptually interesting, gripping, and highly original, while the remaining books do little more than ring the changes on the future that has emerged by the end of the second book.  The series as a whole sank without a ripple at the time - no Hugos, no Nebulas at the time, though has been thoroughly decorated retroactively.  Clearly enjoying a rehabilitation in the present day.  Overall, though, you’ve got two really pretty decent books and two ordinary ones.
  • Ender’s Game and Speaker for the Dead both were awarded the Hugo and Nebula, the first time an author had achieved that dual recognition twice.  Ender’s Game capped the first part of Orson Scott Card’s career, in which all of his protagonists were boys under ten years old; Speaker for the Dead, his first book to feature an adult protagonist, is even better.  Both are widely considered to be among the best ever, though the first has a wider appeal due to its military-technical setting and accessibility to children.  Soon after Speaker, OSC entered the third part of his career, in which he appears to have gone crazy and forgotten how to write, while subjugating his talents to the service of his bizarre conservative-Mormon ideology.  So in the Ender et al series, you’ve got two transcendant books, a couple of brilliant misfires, and a bunch of paper-thin politico-ideologico-homophobico-crap. 

[Digression: Card's current homophobia is especially repellent, even creepy, given this early novel, whose protagonist is a young boy who's such a beautiful singer that the 3rd person omniscient narrator takes it for granted that virtually every man he meets will want to, er, possess him.  That's not the point of the book, but it's what happens throughout.]

a Loved all the Earthsea books when I was a kid, haven’t gone back to them since.  Wizard was probably my favorite book at one time.

b Covered this above - I just don’t think that the last half of the series belongs in the list.  The first book was a brave, original, and exciting anti-McCarthy hard-sf yarn - put it on there as a proxy for all of the brave SF writers who satirized the government when it was risky.

c I know, I know, this is on there as a placeholder for the whole Discworld series, but come on! There are much better books in the series to hold this place.  Why not put all of Discworld in, as well as all of Harry Potter, for that matter?

d Loved it when I was a kid, hate it as an adult.  Idiot characters, rape fantasies, horrendous prose.  Donaldson is the Robert Ludlum of F&SF, with the scary harbinger of continued output even after his death.

e Honestly, I have no idea whether I finished this.  I remember a couple of scenes quite vividly, and it’s really unusual that I don’t finish a book once I’ve started it.  Must have made a huge impression on me.

f Same as e, without the memory of the scenes.  I remember holding the beautful trade paperback edition in my hands, and discussing it with all of my friends who were reading it at the same time, but nothing at all of the story itself. Another huge influence on my life.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

High Concept Monday #1

“High Concept” is a characterization of a story as a synthesis of two other well-known works, as in the long opening scene of Robert Altman’s The Player - “So it’s like Ghost meets The Manchurian Candidate?

For some time now, Chris and I have been been playing the High Concept game - choose a particularly bizarre combination of movies, and describe the story for them - and I’m finally going to start the inevitable regular blog feature.  You can play too! There are two ways to contribute.

One is describe an actual movie or book with a combination that’s unusual but makes sense, like:

Saw: it’s Friday the Thirteenth meets My Dinner with André!

The other is to make up a new movie or book idea with a combination that’s so outlandish, it begs to be written:

Jackass meets Heaven Can Wait:

It’s all over for failed stuntman Jack Malone when he rear-ends a huge male moose while driving drunk on a dark Maine road; the last thing he sees are giant moose testicles rushing toward him at seventy miles an hour.  Then he finds out that Heaven is pretty much the same kind of thing…

Extra points for avoiding the movie Rollerball, because that’s just too easy. 

Rollerball meets Flowers for Algernon:

March 21.  My name is Charly.  The doctor tole me this operayshun would make me a reely good skater…

Posted in Uncategorized

Chris did a Knave painting!

My first novel is called Knave of Yes. 

The setting is a city called Heathness that climbs from the ocean up the east side of a mountain; there’s a tower in the castle that rises above the mountain peak, so sunrise catches it first. 

Chris is my first reader, and, other than my parents, the only person who’s read the whole thing.  Chris painted the moment when sunrise catches the highest tower:

 I’m completely overwhelmed.

Thanks, Chris! 

Posted in Uncategorized

Skott’s around the web…

Vaguely threatening…

http://www.dieyoung.org/

Fortunately, I don’t have enough hair to be confused with Mr. Die-Young.

 

Brilliant:

http://courtney.monstro.com/

 

Top spot on Google:

http://www.skottfreedman.com/

 

Top spot on MySpace:

http://www.myspace.com/dredskott

 

Professional:

http://www.poskanzerskott.com/

Although I don’t know what that is on the side of his head.

 

Bridal Shopping in Denmark:

Important note:

More music:

http://www.djskott.com/

 

More MySpace:

http://www.myspace.com/najaolesen

 

Headhunters:

http://www.skottedwards.com/

 

Oh, fabulous: noted Playboy film director:

http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0811143/

Posted in Uncategorized

My first ever political endorsement…

Scott Kleeb, Democrat, running for Congress from the Nebraska’s Fighting 3rd District!  He’s running as a Democrat from one of the reddest states in the union, and he’s just one letter off in each name from having the coolest name evah!  [Although, he spells his name the way most people pronounce mine.  For the record, my name is pronounced klee' - bee.]

Vote for him, if you can!

or donate, if you can’t.

Posted in Uncategorized

Hi there, voters, how do you feel?

Via TRex at Firedoglake:

 Vote for the Instant Karma party right now:

The band is The Pinker Tones

Cheer up your morning.  If you’ve got a blog, post it again.  If you’ve got two, post it twice:

<object width=”425″ height=”350″><param name=”movie” value=”http://www.youtube.com/v/lNMEdBhvHK8″></param><embed src=”http://www.youtube.com/v/lNMEdBhvHK8″ type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” width=”425″ height=”350″></embed></object>

Posted in Uncategorized

Updates to Knave of Yes

The CSGJAC workshop reviewed the first chapter of Knave and handed me a thick pile of feedback, much positive, much substantive.  Jeff Carver in particular is a very careful reader and editor, and I incorporated nearly all of his recommendations in a further draft.  I thought I’d update the spreadsheet after this round:

Knave spreadsheet

There was some consensus that the first chapter was too long, which surprised me; it’s now shorter by about five pages, and much tighter.  The chart shows that I’ve dropped a couple of chapters since the last pic; the Works chapter went away during the Great Funicular Purge, and the Moonlight chapter, always too short, got shorter and wound up part of the Mothers chapter. 

Big question: if Chapter 1 was too long at ~7500 words, how will people react to chapter 8?

Posted in Writing